Own the rights? Add a poster » Cast
Edit StorylineAdd Full Plot | Add SynopsisPlot Keywords:People's Liberation Army | Historic Figure | U.S. Embassy | Politics | Nationalist China | See more »Parents Guide:View content advisory » Edit DetailsCountry:ChinaRelease Date:17 September 2009 (China) See more »Company CreditsProduction Co:Beijing Poly-bona Film Publishing Company, CCTV Movie Channel, China Film Group See more » Show detailed company contact information on IMDbPro » Technical SpecsRuntime:138 minSound Mix:Dolby DigitalColor:ColorAspect Ratio:2.35 : 1 Edit Did You Know?TriviaThe film was made to coincide with the 60th anniversary of the Chinese Communist Party founding of China. The film boasts the most number of China's movie stars in one film. Many of the top stars were invited to star as leads, supporting characters, or just cameo in the film, reportedly including some of the top Chinese stars like 'Jackie Chan' and Jet Li, who only have one shot or one line in the film. See more »Frequently Asked QuestionsThis FAQ is empty. Add the first question.User ReviewsRecommendations |
In much of the propaganda that pervades previous characterizations of Chiang and his Nationalist forces, the Chinese Communists have tended to portray the Chinese civil war as one of black v white, good v evil, with victorious communist forces "liberating" the people from an evil regime. These words still appear today when it is advantageous to Chinese interest. But in this film Chiang seems reflective, fair-minded and concerned over excesses in his own regime--a rather positive image.
Mao is treated to several revisions, appearing jovial, tolerant, and even permissive of some forms of capitalism, the latter something Mao never actually was in his revolutionary days. Indeed, there is little revolutionary fervor in Mao's dialogue in this film, a fervor which in real life permeated Mao's thinking. This seems deliberate, as these ideas would accord little with the current regime in Beijing. In one scene where Mao is shown in an avuncular, loving role with children, even though in real life Mao abandoned his children to pursue his ambitious revolutionary strategies.
While KMT excesses are detailed, including several assassinations, there is absolutely no mention of CCP atrocities committed during the Chinese civil war. And, while KMT violations of the interim treaty between the two sides are highlighted, there is no mention of CCP violations of the same pre-civil war accords.
While most of the film is richly detailed in costumes and settings, the special effects are not very realistic, with several airplane scenes being utterly unconvincing as they are obviously CGI. The film is a product of Chinese film makers, but political interests in Beijing factored heavily in its production. I doubt that the movie will generate much interest outside of China.